May-any-State-or-Territory-create-enact-or-enforce-any-penal-statute-or-constitutional-provision-in-CONTUMACY-of-the-Sixth-Amendment-right-to-a-Speedy-Trial

No question identified. : | THE PETITIONER PRESENTS THE FOLLOWING QUESTION(s): 1. May any State or Territory create, enact or enforce? any penal statute or constitutional provision in CONTUMACY of the Sixth Amendment right to a Speedy Trial? 2. What is the “time limit” of a Speedy Trial in a State? criminal proceeding? More so when the state fails to have a time limit for a Speedy Trial4. 3. The Petitioner is challenging the constitutionality of the State of Oklahoma’s penal statute(s) and constitutional> provision(s) governing the time limits of Speedy | Trial, [from the filing of information to arraignment and trial], [Title 22, Ch. 11 § | 812.1 to 812.17: Title 22, Ch. 1 § 13 and Oklahoma Constitution, Article IT § 205]. 4. “Is it constitutional for a State to confine a pre-trial detainee in solitary | | confinement, [administrative segregation] for three (3) years, (1081 days)? All | because he invoked his constitutional right(s) to a speedy trial and demanded the } state’s discovery along with the refusal to sign the State’s volume(s) of plea offers”. 5. The Petitioner is challenging the CONSTITUTIONALITY of the Oklahoma Public Defender’s?, POLICY AND PROCEDURE(s)*. 6. The Petitioner is raising a question of constitutionality of whether a state may | conceal vital TRANSCRIPTS from criminal defendant(s) filing appellate review?. | ? Violation(s) Article VI, clause 2 and the 14" Amendment , 5 This question pertains to all 50 state(s) and all territories of the United States NOT just OKLAHOMA : 4 Oklahoma does not have a Penal Statute defining our right to Speedy Trial or its time limit(s). 5 Requesting that Oklahoma amend its State Constitution Article I] § 20 to contain the language of the Speedy Trial Act; “...70 days to speedy trial...” 6 The Petitioner argues these law(s) are in direct contumacy of the United States Constitution; Article 6, clause 2; Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment(s). 7 known as the Oklahoma Indigent Defense System 8 Exorbitance and contumacy of Faretta v. Cali. 422 U.S. 806 (1975) * transcripts vital to proving their actual-factual innocence Page 2 of 30 | ii”