Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the facts alleged in Petitioner's complaint are true and non-frivolous
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED © | i, Whether the facts alleged in Petitioner's complaint are true and non| Frivolous despite the bizarre and unusual nature of the case rather than “frivolous” as stated by the lower court, which erroneously dismissed this case. ii. Petitioner brought this action and request its expedition to compel Respondents and this Court to allow Petitioner to immediately and safely confer with her attorney of 4 years, Mark J. Geragos, and , anyone else necessary to stop this horrific violent 24/7 terrorism of . | Petitioner for 32 %+ years and without any more delays; and ensuring | our U. S. Constitution and laws are enforced. i.
2022-10-31
Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U. S. C. §1, and since the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U. S. C. §2109, which provides that under these circumstances "the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court." The Chief Justice, Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kavanaugh, Justice Barrett, and Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-04
Letter from petitioner dated October 4, 2022 filed.
2022-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-22
Waiver of right of respondent Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
2022-07-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 22, 2022)
2022-07-12
Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioner Mary Jo Weidrick.