Whether the Appeals Court ruling deprived petitioner of his right under Brady v. Maryland, where the Government had violated its obligation to turn over exculpatory evidence

No question identified. : QuesTeon<s) PRESENTED XX, Whether ar niot the Agooals Court Tuliwg deprived patittonor oF his Tight under Braoly V. Maryland. Su pra.where tne Government had Violated is obligation to turn Over Oxculpatory Lyi donice.. TT. Whether or not the Appes!s Court procedure did mot OFFord pati ftomer a Fol) anid Fair hearing uniclor Holmes V:Seoth Carolina, Supra. TIL. Whether or Nol the Appeals Coort abusss its discretion fy mot Covering faction 124 (c) under Bailey Vv. United States. Supra. CousTsTxonel Anup Same” Rroyzons NvolveD _ “The: Appoals Court Committed vevers thle 2tTor ky preventing peritiower From introdu cinig, gvidence Government's Exhibit 4 <p) Cape» Where oFemale at alocation that the police Yecri ved a lot oF Complaint; Ti. 38.L.6~t.aboout | prostitution and drugs; Ma 46. L. 5-24. Who Suppliored Morris Ferre \\<moriss | With « Ygram oF Crack Cocaine, Cand then plied the Sell Charge.on Lanton.sr> Soe Appawdsx 4. ante Ty. 1S3,.L.3-& as the 2xclusion oF the Qvidenco Vrolated the Fit, Gixth Gnd Fourteenth amendments by allowad the prosecutor to Argue his gutlt based on the tape Conduct related +o the. possesston COME; Intent to distribute Cocaine base... fabitioner Tight 4o Cow Front the OFFicers, Whether the police adsguotely pursuad that atfernative Gusprcr, CN. IF the: did not Why they did mot. A right to ConFromt goverwment Witwes's Morr’ s, Sot Ferret, Dot. Estes; 1%. 39,1. 15-19. aintd LT Suro ingers Wy 93, L228 Uns Vi0lated Lyhen he Was Not allowed to Cross oxamivethem regor dling the Female. Patiiomer es Unable to presanit his daFansa. that Someone 2189. Was Tesponsible For Suppharing Morris With the drugs.2d. Te Slatement did dxonzrate him kucouse’ he Ghs Chargod With the Same tus, Ty. 153, Ll 1S. plastic baggy: es lowtaing 4 gram ree Ghd -S gram oF Crack Co Came IN them. tow2v2n the TeCoro indicates Gy the Pumala Wether Morris, “Wy 13.1. 18-40. Sgt Ferrell, Out. Estes anc) L, TStwonr ingest did tot tes tified at length on the Gkand or Onclr Wet Ixtensi ve Lxami nation, . and Wor diol their destim ony anid Cross 2xamination Coveresl indetail, their | Yecollaction oF the Telovants Government tape in Favor OF potitioner Whew! Yeview the Sixth amendment Claim Unolar tujo Supreme Court Case® 21). Holmss Y, South Coralina, 547 US 317, 294, 196 S. C.1747, 164 L. Ed, 24 S03 (00k) Q-oF-1@ | 4 anid 2>Delawore Vi Van Arsdoll 47S U.S. 613,106 §.C4 1913, 89 L.Ed, Sol 62y ¢ 19865 | Holmes, of 324. | STHEMENTOF We. CASE : OM April 4,30, petitioner Filad his 38 Us.c.Sochon AAI (C><3>, oly, BR, BOB, He District Court denied Lantonsr:Fedoral hakeas relieF.and both the pistri ct Court | Ond the U-S.Coort oF Appeals For the Fourth Girestt Sommorily dactined fo grant Lontow Sr. “Cor HiFicate oF appealabity <con) Section 2AS3 <c> appears Cot Ap pand'x A and Appanid’x B . Concluding thathis Claim bas not 2v2n olabota~ | lz, Without a Lon. Louton,se; Cannot obtain appaliate Teview ov the merits OF his Claim. Withhelding portion oF the Government's Exh to it 4 <R) tape indicated thot ‘Gn unknown Female had Supphiered morr's With the Same drug’s Lenton, Sr. Lyas thorga With and Convicted, Lovld be a Classic Violation oF the prosecutors Constitutional to disclose Material D¥idanca Pavorabia +o the defense. Fg,3-3, “The trial Court Said vnaguivocally that the tape Should have been tured over. See “Hh, S.L-8-13. ¢ disaribing the Prosscutor *s Aaci sion aS Showing “Clear disregarol | For her respowsibi itty as a prosecutor to Sak gostics “) The mains gvestion throughout the history oF Loptom,Sr. Case has bon Whether the ‘tape Was ” mateial “+6 the sory 's vilty Vardi ct Thy.3%b, 1-18. Soe 9.9, WoarryV. Cain, 517 US. 351,136 S.C+ 1008, | Ki L€d. 8d. <A016).To 9Stablishthat the fope Was; Ty. A&A. L,1924. Mater/a)” Cand thus to prevail in the Couct> Lenton, Sr. hal to Shoo ONy that the taps. Lwou} Id” undermine ConFidance ‘tu the Verdict,” 1 “Thy, lor. L.S9, The ee. L. be19, | Owd “TPs. 109, ..13-%. Not that he Would