I. Whether ar noit the Agooals Court Tuliwg deprived patittonor oF his Tight under Braoly V. Maryland. Su pra.where tne Government had Violated is obligation to turn Over Oxculpatory Lyi donice..

II. Whether or not the Appes!s Court procedure did mot OFFord pati ftomer a Fol) anid Fair hearing uniclor Holmes V:Seoth Carolina, Supra.

III. Whether or Nol the Appeals Coort abusss its discretion fy mot Covering faction 124 (c) under Bailey Vv. United States. Supra.

Whether the Appeals Court ruling deprived petitioner of his right under Brady v. Maryland, where the Government had violated its obligation to turn over exculpatory evidence