1. Do the sua sponte dismissals by the lower courts under the in forma pauperis statute 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e) (2) (B), in which the reviewing court merely substituted the "frivolous " subsection (ii) for the "failure to state a claim " subsection (i), directly conflict with this Court 's precedents regarding the merging of the "failure to state a claim " and "frivolous " standards?

2. Do sua sponte dismissals of in forma pauperis and pro se complaints bar meaningful access to the justice system to the most vulnerable members of society and defy Congress ' alleged intent in enacting the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e) (2) (B), to afford indigent individuals equal access to justice?

Do the sua sponte dismissals by the lower courts under the in forma pauperis statute 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e) (2) (B), in which the reviewing court merely substituted the 'frivolous' subsection (ii) for the 'failure to state a claim' subsection (i), directly conflict with this Court's precedents regarding the merging of the 'failure to state a claim' and 'frivolous' standards?