Whether the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals abided by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Questions Presented: 1. Whether the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals abided by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution when they denied the petitioner’s right to a trial which excluded the opportunity for evidence to be presented proving perjury committed by the GAL, Foster Mother, and others on the opposing side of the case along with evidence of Hampshire County Circuit Court transcripts being purposely edited and abuse of power of the Hampshire County Circuit : Court judge Carter Williams, whom is currently facing abuse of power charges pertaining to other matters and under investigation for many issues of abuse of power. 2. Whether or not the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals abided by the Federal Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 by refusing to support family unity between the minor child and her biological family. 3. Whether or not the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals abided by the Federal Family First Prevention Services Act by refusing to consider the petitioner (Maternal Grandmother) and all other family biologically related to the minor child. 4. Whether or not the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals abided by the due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment which protects a private realm of family life when they disallowed all family from being involved in the minor child’s life preventing the minor child from acquiring a sense of family history, bond with biological family, bond, sense of ethnic background, etc. 5. Whether or not the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals abided by Ed. 2d 551 (1972), the court maintains that family preservation is a priority and that the United States Constitution protects family integrity. Family Integrity was not protected due to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, GAL, Circuit Court Judge, and Hampshire County Department of Health and Human Services refusing to consider any and all family. 6. Whether the West Virginia Supreme Court of appeals and Hampshire County Circuit Court abided by Federal laws pertaining to perjury when they ignored perjury committed by the | GAL, foster mother whom is attempting to adopt the minor child, and West Virginia : Department of Health and Human Resources. | | | |