Haider Salah Abdulrazzak v. Brent Fluke, Warden, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
whether-the-district-court-abused-its-discretion-in-denying-rule-60(b)-motion
questions presented here are the same those submitted for the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to issue a Certificate of Appealability (COA): | | ee ; | qd) Whether the district court abused its discretion when it denied Abdulrazzak's motion to reopen (alter or amend) final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), | only reasoning the finality of the previous judgment. | (2) If the presiding judge’s unfitness qualifies as the sort of “defect in the integrity of the federal habeas proceeding”, where the records reflect evidence that the district | judge patterns of ignorance and repeated judicial errors, about the laws controlling | procedural defaulted claims, Petitioner was entitled to new district judge. | |