No. 22-5190
Rafael Cortez-Oropeza v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: admissibility-of-evidence atf bureau-of-alcohol-tobacco-and-firearms criminal-procedure evidence expert-testimony firearms interstate-commerce judicial-discretion legal-standard
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in allowing an unqualified ATF agent to testify as an expert on interstate commerce
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Should certiorari be granted where the district court itself called this case a “close” situation when an unqualified Special Agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, who had never before been called as an expert on interstate commence, testified as an expert on whether the firearms and ammunition seized in Petitioner’s home had been shipped or transported in interstate commerce? i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Rafael Cortez-Oropeza
Steven A. Feldman — Feldman & Feldman, Petitioner
Steven A. Feldman — Feldman & Feldman, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent