Did the courts err in their interpretation and application of Strickland v. Washington in petitioner's case, failing to find ineffective assistance of trial counsel?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | VDid the Courts acc iM Hs interpretation and application oF Steicklend ve Weashia gtan in petitianes Case tailing ; Attorneys gcdss etac trial strategy ? D.Didthe cascts ect ints refusal te property apply Sehlue * Pele &s a" gote way theaigh wshich o habeas pe¥ ry nee must pass to hese his othel usise bacced consti tubtyonal claim Consideced on its mecits? 2. Diddhe Cooths acc in ite cajechian of the Cacciet Standacd as established law, when @hdenc® 2uists te shes a yolahan OF Bradys the wilh belding of exw priory DNA = Leb cepacks, teok aoiay petits onecs ability to establish Ceasonalble deubt? UY Didthe coocts ete (as denial of 3 heacing under CP S330) WI Ca) Ce) 2 | | | | " ,