Whether the appeals court abused its discretion by dismissing petitioner's notice of appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as to untimeliness?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER THE APPEALS COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY DIS-~MISSING PETITIONER'S "NOTICE OF APPEAL" FROM THE DENIAL OF A MOTION TO VACATE, FILED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255, AS TO UNTIMELINESS? WHETHER THE APPEALS COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY REFUSING TO ENTERTAIN JURISDICTION TO REVIEW THE DENIAL OF A 28 U.S.C. § 2255 "MOTION TO VACATE", -BASED ON AN UNTIMELY FILING OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL, WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT HAD RULED THAT THE NOTICE OF APPEAL WAS TIMELY FILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 4(a)(6), OF THE FEDERAL RULES. OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE? CAN THE COURT OF APPEALS GRANT MOTIONS FOUR MONTHS LATER THE SAME COURT DENIED AND DISMISSED THE SAME MOTIONS?