1. The Supreme Court should help decide in Federal & State Court Split,to review "Newly Reliable Evidence" under Herrera House Schulp type claims. Is it Newly Discovered or Newly Presented?

2. Under 2254(D)(1) would deprive petitioner to obtain A De Novo Review, & to Correct"a Miscarriage Of Justice.

3. This Gives rhe Supreme Court a opportunity to review Actual Innocence Claims,to Correct a Miscarriage Of Justice.

4. The Courts decision is Incorrect in not resolving his Actual Innocence claims,Overcome the AEDPA Statue Of Limitations

5. The Supreme Court should help decide,if the Federal estate Courts decision is Incorrect?

6. This Gives Supreme Court opportunity, to resolve his Actual Innocent Claims to his Constitutional Claims on the Merit's.

7. The Supreme Court should help decide on Federal & State Courts not wanting to review his Strauder V.Uest Virginia , Equal Protection Right Claims.

8. The Supreme Court should help resolve his Brady violations that allowed the Federal & State Courts to wit hi held Exculpatory Impeachment Evidence to Illegality convict a Adtually Innocent Man.

9. The Supreme Court should help decide on Federal & State Court Split,on "A New Rule" violating his Confrontation Clause Rights, decided in Crawford V.Washington,made Retroactive after his conviction in 2 0 0 4 .

10. The Supreme Court should help resolve his "Newly Presented Evidence",to allow petitioner Actual Innocent claims to pass thru "Gateway".

11. The Supreme Court should help resolve his Ineffective Assist ance Of Counsel Claims,that allowed State Protection to Illegally convict a Actual Innocent man.

Federal & State Court Split on Newly Reliable Evidence