Federal & State Court Split on Newly Reliable Evidence

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. The Supreme Court should help decide in Federal & State Court Split,to review "Newly Reliable Evidence" under Herrera House Schulp type claims. Is it Newly Discovered or Newly Presented? 2. Under 2254(D)(1) would deprive petitioner to obtain A De Novo Review,& to Correct«a Miscarriage Of Justice. 3. This Gives the Supreme Court a opportunity to review Actual Innocence Ciaims,to Correct a Miscarriage Of Justice. 4. The Courts decision is Incorrect in not resolving his Actual Innocence claims,Overcome tne AEOPA Statue Of Limitations. 5. The Supreme Court should help decide,if the Federal & State Courts decision is Incorrect? . oo 6. This Gives Supreme Court opportunity. to.resolve his Actual Innocent Claims to his Constitutional Claims an the Merit's,. 7. The Supreme Court should heip decide on Feuveral & State Courts not wanting to review his Strauder V.lJest Virginia,Equal Protection Right Ulaims. 8. The Supreme Court should help resolve his Brady violations that allowed the Federal & State Courts to withheld Exculpatory Impeachment Evidence to Illegazly convict a Adtually Innocent Man. | 9. The Supreme Court should help decide on Federal & State Court Split,on "A New Rule" violating his Confrontation Ciause Rigints, Gecided in Crawford V.Washington,made Retroactive atter his conviction in 2004. 10. The Supreme ULourt should help resolve his "Newly Presented Evidence",to allow petitioner Actuai Innocent claims to pass thru "Gateway". . 11. The Supreme Court should help resolve his Ineffective Assistance Uf Counsel Claims,that allowed State Protection to Illegally convict a Actual Innocent man. aaa ; a