Whether the purpose of Rule 403 is to exclude relevant but substantially prejudicial evidence that outweighs the probative value of extraneous sexual offenses

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _. QUESTION 1: Certiorari should be granted to determine whether the purpose of : Rule 403 is: to exclude relevant but substantially prejudicial evi, dence, that outweighes the probative value of extraneous sexual ‘offenses? Page 11 . QUESTION 2: Certiorari should be granted to determine whether the Dallas Court ; of Appeals' decision conflicts: with Old Chief v. U.S., when J.R.'s sexual egtraneous offense's probative value is outweighed by its . ' prejudicial effect on the jury? Page 13 ; QUESTION 3:.Is this Court convinced that several sexual assaults occurred in a ; ; four bedroom home with people living in it and one adult usually being at the home, without anyone catching Petitioner in the act Le and without anybody ever knowing about the allegations? Page 13-14 , QUESTION 4: Certiorari should be granted to determine whether the jury was over_. whelmed by the substential. amount of sexual extraneous offenses of a J.R., who was not named in the indictment, renders Petitioner's trial fundamentially unfair by the danger of the unfair prejudice ; against him? . Page 15-16 QUESTION 5: Certiorari should be granted to determine whether Due Process Clause affords relief where the sexual extraneous evidence concerning J.R. had been the principle focus. at trial? . Page 16 Gk