No. 22-5206
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 924(c) actual-innocence circuit-court-review concurrent-sentence-doctrine criminal-conviction criminal-procedure invalid-conviction judicial-procedure jury-instruction sentencing-error statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-01-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Third Circuit Erred in Utilizing the Concurrent Sentence Doctrine to Uphold a Concededly Invalid 924(c) Conviction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the Third Circuit Erred in Utilizing the Concurrent Sentence Doctrine to Uphold a Concededly Invalid 924(c) Conviction -i '
Docket Entries
2023-01-23
Petition DENIED
2023-01-23
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
2022-12-12
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-11-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 12, 2022.
2022-11-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 10, 2022 to December 12, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-10-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 10, 2022.
2022-10-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 11, 2022 to November 10, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-08
Response Requested. (Due October 11, 2022)
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent