Whether the Court of Appeals erred when it issued its Mandate without addressing the Appellants' claim of County Appellees' withholding of disclosure evidence, which was raised in the district court during summary judgment and the issue was raised in Appellants' Opening Brief

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a) Didi +42 94" CIM. Court of Appeals arr when it :séued rts Mandate tout i Ak aot address ‘TAN BF Appellants clam of County Appellees w/ holding of clisclosute auidlence, white |, Aigathag in the district cour dururg sum Mary Judgment and the issue was resed in Appellants Opening Bred © CH Has Mn Bs 4* auverdment, Ledera| due proce Ss rights Deen viglated, Sie. the Alig of Has /awsort th 2019 b the present time, based on underlining relaked elements already claimed im this case" ¥ Kole! Fst amore detailed mforivate y plerse se@ atiached So) posse ULS) Innate Legal Seruces Petition, Page UG) axplais He dboye Avestan dasre fatroughty, vf “ we