Whether Petitioner should be granted a Certificate of Appealability

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I, Whether Petitioner should be granted a Certificate of Appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253 on the issue of whether ~ (A) Petitioner was denied his U.S. Constitutional right to Due Process under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) and In re Winship, 397 US 358, 25 L Ed 2d 368, 90 S Ct 1068 : (1970), when the state's evidence against the Petitioner was insufficient to prove the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt; and (B) Petitioner was denied his constitutional right to a full and fair jury trial due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel caused by a conflict between his attorneys and Petitioner in the presentation of a viable defense in violation of the 5th, 6, and 14", Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, and clearly established federal law in Strickland v. Washington. 2 ‘ 4 . :