Whether the district court in San Diego, California, was justified in denying the in forma pauperis status to the plaintiff-appellant

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . ‘ Whe He DislereT Couiel in San Diego, CaliForlit, JUSTIFIED IN Denying : ir iNTFFA ELLANT SHOWED HE WAS INDIGENT/A pauper AnD RATED oan 13 ane aie For His To Br GeantleD-Ln Forma Pauptes ) iN il Appellants RegGeED ay WL MADTO BE PeAeD by Pan FF 2) PLANTIFF-AppENLANT PND THE Filing Fess 6 This Case, WHERE THE ht Geen! Court of _fopeals EAeoreD iN Dismissing AFT @etinig PPELLANIS Cage Tus ying Te Desi oF In Forrnye Pauper’ Salas Te PLantiFF-AppeLLAnly STAT ng He lower Dteicd Couad WHEPE JuSheD in Den) PLE: ; Sc 1983 CiviL Complaint Bechuse Open al Nees AZ US-&.8 TT Be ee CRUSE PETiTionte= Appellant HAD FiLeD Rr LEAS] THREE Pion Aion wilicH THe baket Courls D _ Faivehous/ MaLicious, WAS A ERROR. By THE NinTH Ceci CouaT. 3) PeTifewep-ACpELL cals PREVIOUS Ci AZT : PpeLLails TREVIOUS Civil. ATTions WERE CompLanils ABSOT PElTion€e= peeled Un iii Bg Fed By His fesse While inl Peison w PT Toubas Boss gor iND THAT PETITIONER. Was CauitfeD OF FoRcED Oral Copulation (UnjuSiFinbly on FALSE Chains) ‘i ERE THAT San DiégoSupenion Couiel Teumnped uomse FALSE Lata To ReaD: Foece Oral Copul Rion Aga A KID UNDER. yenes 4) DIOTHE NinTH CiecdiT Couiel of Appen's ee eel Ais Pies To Resse Wns Heasel Palin Te REHRIE Defeat Be RELATED To THe DeFENDanT MicHa yee ney OFF ice? ATToRNey Riverside Superior Court House Claims Ronessulh OFF Wes IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW X For cases from federal courts: , The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at