Whether appellate review of a sentence imposed after the revocation of a defendant's supervised-release term is for reasonableness or merely to see if the sentence is plainly unreasonable

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether appellate review of a sentence imposed after the revocation of a defendant’s supervised-release term is for reasonableness, as United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007), and HolguinHernandez v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 762 (2020) indicate or is it, as the Fifth Circuit held, merely to see if the sentence is plainly unreasonable.