Whether the petitioner's speech, which is content-based, on a matter of public-concern, and made while exercising one's right to counsel, is protected by the first amendment's free speech clause as-applied to the facts of the case

Questions Presented: Whether the petitioner’s speech, which is content-based, on a matter of public-concern, and made while exercising one’s right to counsel, is protected by the first amendment’s free speech clause as-applied to the facts of the case Whether the evidence was insufficient to sustain the convictions because the correspondence that formed the basis of the convictions were based on protected speech. Whether there was sufficient evidence to convict petitioner of stalking and harassment. Whether the reasonable-person standard is constitutional in criminal law. Whether a showing of actual innocence in the record on certiorari to a state court of last resort, should be automatic grounds for intervention by this court. Whether the maiicious abuse of court process by state actors to incarcerate and/or otherwise deprive an actually innocent defendant of their liberty, is a form of cruel and unusual punishment.