No. 22-5216

Ray Salazar v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel investigation mental-competency sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-12-09 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the trial counsel's failure to timely and adequately conduct an investigation into Salazar's known mental health issues constitute ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Due Process, Cause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits Crieinal Prostartion of defewdant Luho is lot Competent to send iel. Salatr Lilleged iris) Comsels fenders ineffeche Assistance Fac Failing to timely Lid Gdequedely Conduct fn investigation lato Salazors Known fMerte| NawHa iste. Heeler ale hin rel Cowl tended jt since _ For Wir awaseness lout Falling to timely gavecate Foc % Coureappolutel Psyonictnst tohove Gosisted He clefeuse. He also Alleged he wes demic _—_—_tifectle assistance oF Counsel on First Bppecl as oF rigit held Way tou clue process 3 Clduse of He Faurteerth Huedmeat, Salazar alleged his Copel wittdrew without —— -apchy adutsug aa tights to tgpad ul Wes wittit Counsel lurtuy He 30 clay pon “To file 4 tutce oF tel Hat wes, 2, cevticel Stage of 4. Criainal Pruceeling. Selezar | Gllegee For Ariel Coork Falta to Noor and tt on Motiad FEC Mews tricl, clesilel We OF DS Cquel Protecticr, Procedural, auel clue Process. hecaue Motiow fared |SSues___ Qutside JM Factoel Mord of muni clserdes aul Conyetenty to have Woes jury did oud Plead gully, nmnenmanrn SEIGLDC IR Spectfully 23K this Howoraie Court to tale 5 ud iniel Note _ — OF Tee Court proreectitg, cons, fil documents in Court's Consideratler OF Tour questios. . _ a — Ai Th quctia in: Oia al Gansea aly Commaboal chan GSstanee oF Couns) Unlertee SAM Htodeiont in tveir Guraveess OF SelaZavs Mortal _ Meal isues Years Pri ty ic burt cle Mut Rul he importante For tively aud Slequatly al inwatigeton ie his atl ivory emt Monte bekie etal E 2. The question is: Did detel Couusls fender Constitetional Sips Mewadsuat Tor efile, Blstaate For Comels Gurareiess of Salazors Mental disoners but Wo Need than. thinly tequested cad olotadned & Covt= C0 Polslied Moura Wee Vey exert to ssist ay valuating, XOMiMInG te determing Selazars Com lr to. CBfers re Ey Silat € alg Te ede a ett i . rs ie? a we . -. L. . os me 7 we . . . . . . _ . 7 7 . oo . . me ~ . 7 “ ey . wee . ae . . . . . fQ Perr tdi daha |] | Spel] Bee Edda yd Pett) |) BEEBE) BE PLT idyll ig aaanada AEE BERRe eee Tt | SUG

Docket Entries

2022-12-12
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-11-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-10-27
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 29, 2022)

Attorneys

Ray Salazar
Ray Salazar — Petitioner
Ray Salazar — Petitioner