No. 22-5239
Edward Bishop v. Jonathan R. Hemingway, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-law criminal-statute double-jeopardy due-process federal-criminal-law fifth-amendment legal-interpretation offense-definition sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether § 924(c) criminalizes two separate offenses to determine if the Petitioner was convicted of an offense § 924(c) does not criminalize?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED .FOR REVIEW Whether § 924(c) criminalizes two seperate‘offenses to determine if the | Pétitioner was convicted of an offense § 924(c) does not criminalize? | | | | | | |
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent Jonathan R. Hemingway, Warden to respond filed.
2022-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2022)
Attorneys
Edward Bishop
Edward Bishop — Petitioner
Jonathan R. Hemingway, Warden
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent