Whether the mailbox rule entitles petitioner for equitable tolling

ISSUES PRESENTED | I. WHETHER OR NOT THE MAILBOX RULE ENTITLES PETITIONER FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING, WHEN THE SUPREME COURT, AS WELL AS THE LOWER COURTS, ACCORD DEFENDANTS LEAVE TO SO UTILIZE THE RULE; | II. WHETHER OR NOT A CRIMINAL OEFENDANT Is ENTITLED TO | "COUNSEL OF CHOICE", AND DENYING A DEFENDANT SUCH A RIGHT INFRINGES UPON THE 6th AND 14th AMENDMENT GUARANTEE; III. WHETHER OR NOT THE VOIR DIRE PROCEEDINGS COMES UNDER CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION AND WHEN JURORS CONDUCT SO TAINTED THE VOIR DIRE PROCEEDING AS To DEPRIVE PETITIONER OF HIS RIGHT TO A FAIR ANO IMPARTIAL TRIAL Iv. WHETHER OR NOT THE 6th AND 14th AMENDMENT GUARANTEE PROTECTS AN ACCUSED AGAINST DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL, RESULTING INTO PREJUDICE AGAINST ‘ PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO OUE PROCESS ANO A’ FUNDAMENTAL FAIR TRIAL | | | | | Ae ed! ss | ii |