No. 22-5247
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bond-hearing confrontation-clause constitutional-rights crawford-precedent crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure due-process evidence florida-arthur-bond-hearing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Florida Arthur/Bond hearing satisfies the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause requirement as explained in Crawford v. Washington
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE FLORIDA ARTHURYBOND HEARING SATISFIES THE SIXTH AMENDMENT’S CONFRONTATION CLAUSE REQUIREMENT AS , EXPLAINED IN CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354 | (2004)? | | | 1 State v. Arthur, 390 So.2d 717 (Fla. 1980) i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-03
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2022-07-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2022)