Did the extrinsic-fraud deprive-Hooper-of-due-process

Question.presented is: Did the extrinsic fraud which deprived Hooper of knowing of the existence of, and effectively having access to, the recordings of his police interrogation, --which were guaranteed to him by. procedural rules --deprived him of the opportunity to mount a meaningful defense under the right to ‘due process? The Second Question presented is: Was the restricted examination, limited to only to its (intrinsic) trial record, by the circuit court regarding Hoglan's claims of extrinsic fraud sufficient enough to make a factual determination on whether or not extrinsic fraud had occurred outside the intrinsic safeguard mechanisms of the ; court's proceedings and its record, and had it had tainted Hooper's due process? The Third Question presented is: ? Does the extrinsic fraud in question nullify ; Hooper's commitment into a plea agreement because he did not voluntarily, : ; knowingly, and intelligently waive his opportunity to continue on with the > proceedings armed with the recordings? , ii ;