Did the lower court violate due-process requirements by failing to provide proper proof-of-service and notice of a hearing before issuing an arrest warrant?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Did the lower court violate established due process requirements when they failed to provide proper “Proof of Service” of “Notice” of a hearing before issuing a warrant for a man’s arrest for “failure to appear”? 2. Is an arresting officer’s failure to produce a valid express warrant prior to serving a bench warrant for “failure to appear” a violation of due process? When asked to “Show me the warrant!” is, “It’s on the computer in the car,” a valid response? Does failure to produce a valid express warrant violate a man’s fundamental liberty under “due process clause” in the Constitution? 3. Does an American man still have a right to resist an unlawful seizure and protect his property and/or himself from a kidnapping or bodily harm where state agents, operating under the color of Law, failed to produce a valid express warrant? Is there any requirement any longer, anywhere in America, that any Public Official in any capacity, is required to follow any of the Statutes, Codes, Rules, Regulations, Ordinances, Policy or Law of this Country? 4. Did the court fail to require the Prosecutor to place in writing on the record, all elements of jurisdiction to establish proper jurisdiction and demonstrate bias and prejudice in favor of the Prosecution, when the Prosecutor failed to identify the proper parties in the matter? And then, disregarded the status of the State National citizen vs. that of the 14» Amendment federal citizen and proceed to trial without establishing in personam jurisdiction? I