Whether the District Court erred in denying relief to Petitioner's 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion based on the applicability of 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(2)(D) factors due to FBOP Medical Services ignoring requests for medical care for post-COVID-19 severe illness

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1.) Whether the District Court erred when it denied relief to Petitioner 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) : motion based upon the applicability of 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(2)(D) factors, due to FBOP Medical Services having ignored repeated requests for medical care for POST-COVID-19 severe illness: : : : 2.a) Whether the First Step Act announced a new substantive rule of Constitutional Law that applies when a prisoner brings 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A) motion, rendering U.S.S.G. 1B1.13 an inapplicable policy statement, except, upon motion of Director of the BOP; 2.6) Further, Petitioner asks this Honorable Court to resolve the Circuit split, whether district courts enjoy full discretion without consulting U.S.S.G. 1B1.13 for 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A) motion brought by a defendant in the, SECOND, FORTH, FIFTH, SIXTH, SEVENTH, NINTH, TENTH, DC, and the EIGHTH Circuit Court of Appeals. { ii.