No. 22-526
Pulak Barua v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-hearing administrative-law default-judgment due-process fourteenth-amendment notice notice-requirement service-of-process state-administrative-agency takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the notice given to Petitioner violated his Due Process rights
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED The administrative law judge entered a default judgment against Petitioner, who had not received notice of the hearing. The notice of the hearing was mailed to the wrong address. Did the notice given to Petitioner violate his Due Process rights? 2
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to respond filed.
2022-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 6, 2023)
2022-07-25
Application (22A60) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 19, 2022.
2022-07-19
Application (22A60) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 21, 2022 to September 19, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Priscilla M. Hubenak — TX Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Priscilla M. Hubenak — TX Attorney General's Office, Respondent