Whether the AEDPA of 1996 violates the Constitution of the United States as to the 1st Amendment and 5th Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 4.Doos the AEDPA oF I9916 Vilate dhe Conslition of the United States 45° 1H, and Sthamendment ° the mMaht bo Seek redress foc grierances 5 halt . not be abridged; IH amendment guarantee Phat Mo State Shall make any Yaw why ch abeld ges the pewelages Oc ammuni hes | d& Dees the Cede Aavh(DMB of the United 3+ . pores Code Give D.C liligands the unlictel ime to Tile 0 2854 OF the Unibed Stale Code Cue 2254) (28 4 use HAS4) . 3, Dees being confined in Solitacy Con fine m— ent (SHv) witheot legal Matecial needed t¢ | complete LSC ABSY gelibion + boiel Ge Bmorths weHhoot infeackion of reason Grounds for equrrable tolling 9 Yy, Did heoial Covet abuse. 5 discce ion by Lowile the motions aegertbed Coer tian, And Rogelake Coons fabure be aise \b mefeckiv | \ 8. Wos Keg oolake Counsel Mefeckve Lorn not BAN a ing in skonces of Vnefecky 2 Soeistanee n Lind PONG OS Caicsed LA the ROCA an \o : ‘ escarc\s, t whet wes vn Ye second by Lo. Wes Aprea tate Counsel ing Céechiwe oq nok Advancing doin Coucts mAysa\ +o acleowledge Vee of flew destimgay : Te Was appealed e Covnsel wrong For HOt advencing Talal covets aosesing Whe merits of case? gf Eas Kepeak ak e Counsel (veeckive Luc pot advancing Atal Courks use of Khe Incoprect lesat Slondard G Wes The BC Courk of aagerle abusing discrekiore, by ae) Sing he in Corpey Leges slondard rn then — Veco of the mandate .