Whether the trial court erred in denying the petitioner's legitimate defense theory

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DL. \Whetherwas the Courtof Appeal Ss dea/s,5,, that Petitioner’: Tria | Sounse| told the jury that nis CHeatwas ger Ity of Murde,for [essep deg Re ol Murder was Su Frerend, Is the. Petitione. enti ted +o A leg tinade defense theo ry Con trary to Glebeu Fros t; S7Y OS. (Zs) ) Petitioner layered inef'Pee biven ESS ASsistaAnce Usein Strekland v. Washington, YeeU.s. O63 Cy) And enn <2 Ryan, I52.5.C+.1309@2012) the Pe ti hisne, ited teine Pfectiveness ASSIstanee to Over Come Precedurally defn, Itec/ 2 UL Whether WAS the Cay rtafA PPeAls decss,, IS the Fetibione entitle toaq Stan dard of Teviewon Ais ClAim< °