No. 22-5264
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: concurrent-sentence constitutional-scrutiny criminal-procedure due-process federal-criminal-procedure federal-sentence post-conviction-relief sentencing sixth-circuit state-sentence
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the due process rights of the Petitioner were violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the due process rights of the Petitioner were violated by the failure of the trial court to address, first at sentencing and then in a post-sentencing motion made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a), a specific request that a remaining state sentence run concurrently with the Petitioner’s federal sentence?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 1, 2022)
Attorneys
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent