No. 22-527

Sammy Jay Riddle v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2022-12-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing guilty-plea ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel state-collateral-review texas-courts texas-criminal-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-03-31 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Texas courts denied petitioner due process by rejecting his substantial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim without conducting an evidentiary-hearing

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the Texas courts denied petitioner due process by rejecting his substantial ineffective assistance of counsel claim without conducting an evidentiary hearing, based on the trial prosecutor’s affidavit, even though the record corroborated petitioner’s and trial counsel’s contradictory affidavits. II. Whether the Texas courts’ refusal to conduct an evidentiary hearing on petitioner’s substantial ineffective assistance of counsel claim conflicts with this Court’s decision in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. Herman v. Claudy, 350 U.S. 116, 123 (1956) (“Under the allegations here petitioner is entitled to relief if he can prove his [constitutional claim]. He cannot be denied a hearing merely because the allegations of his petition were contradicted by the prosecuting officers.”). III. Whether due process requires a trial court to admonish a defendant, before accepting a guilty plea, that the plea waives the defendant’s constitutional right to require the prosecution to prove each essential element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision concerning this issue conflicts with decisions of other state high courts. ii RELATED CASES e State of Texas v. Riddle, No. 17477, 253rd District Court of Texas. Order of Deferred Adjudication entered February 23, 2016. e State of Texas v. Riddle, No. 17477, 253rd District Court of Texas. Judgment Adjudicating Guilt entered August 22, 2016. e Riddle v. State of Texas, No. 01-16-00657-CR, Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas. Opinion entered August 23, 2018. e Riddle v. State of Texas, No. PD-1007-18, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Order Refusing Discretionary Review entered December 5, 2018. e =6Ex parte Riddle, No. WR-91,158-01, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Order Denying Habeas Corpus Relief entered September 7, 2022. e =6Ex parte Riddle, No. WR-91,158-01, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Order Denying Suggestion for Reconsideration entered September 26, 2022.

Docket Entries

2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-27
2023-03-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-02-23
2023-02-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 27, 2023.
2023-01-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 27, 2023 to February 27, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-12-28
Response Requested. (Due January 27, 2023)
2022-12-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-20
Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.
2022-12-05

Attorneys

Sammy Jay Riddle
Josh Barrett SchafferSchaffer Law Offices, Petitioner
Josh Barrett SchafferSchaffer Law Offices, Petitioner
State of Texas
Eric Charles CarceranoChambers County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Eric Charles CarceranoChambers County District Attorney's Office, Respondent