No. 22-5272

J. R. v. North Dakota

Lower Court: North Dakota
Docketed: 2022-08-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-review constitutional-rights due-process ineffective-assistance jurisdictional-findings juvenile-court standing
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Juvenile Court's record contain substantial evidence to support the court's jurisdictional findings as to the father

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ood, Did the Juvenile Court's record contain substantial Evidence to Support the Courts' . Jurisdictional Findings as to Father... ccc 2. Did the Juvenile court abused it's discretion in failing to fully and adequately address the 2012 Supplemental Divorce Judgment... 3. Did Father's trial counsel provide him unreasonable, inadequate and/or ineffective assistance of counsel by giving ill advice, misleading, lying and failing to fully and/or adequately advise father of his rights, options and any consequences of not contesting the deprivation | determination in regards to both his and his Daughter's lawful and constitutional rights in those , PLOCCEMIN GS...

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2022)

Attorneys

J. R.
James Arthur Ross — Petitioner
James Arthur Ross — Petitioner