No. 22-5277

Leila Nasser Asr v. Karen Eady-Williams, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aliens aliens-rights civil-rights constitutional-precedent courts due-process human-rights international-law judicial-conduct jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do the United States courts have jurisdiction to hear aliens' cases or aliens must file their lawsuits against United States citizens in courts of their home country?

Question Presented (from Petition)

Questions Presented 1. Do the United States courts have jurisdiction to hear aliens’ cases or aliens must file their lawsuits against United States citizens in courts of their home country? 2. Are the United States courts obligated to comply with the international human rights law, United States constitution, treaties, and laws, and the precedent set by the Supreme Court when rendering decisions in aliens’ cases? 3. The fact that aliens are victims does not alter the conclusion that United States judge’s actions constitute conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute so that the judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging aliens cases that are presented for adjudication. When there is systematic hatred, animosity, and decimation against aliens in the State Courts, Federal Courts, and Appeal Courts, and when the judges of these courts coercively deprive aliens of their fundamental human rights and deny justice to aliens, who in the United States is responsible to protect aliens’ rights? . 2

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-02
Waiver of right of respondents Daniel R. Hansen; KinderCare Education, LLC, f/k/a Knowledge Universe Education, LLC; KinderCare Learning Centers, LLC, d/b/a Park Road KinderCare to respond filed.
2022-08-25
Waiver of right of respondents Anthony Giordano and Giordano, Gordon & Burns PLLC to respond filed.
2022-08-17
Waiver of right of respondents Charles G Monnett III and Charles G. Monnett III & Associates to respond filed.
2022-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2022)

Attorneys

Anthony Giordano and Giordano, Gordon & Burns PLLC
Ryan D. BolickCranfill Sumner LLP, Respondent
Ryan D. BolickCranfill Sumner LLP, Respondent
Charles G Monnett III
Charles Guy Monnett IIICharles G Monnett III & Associates, Respondent
Charles Guy Monnett IIICharles G Monnett III & Associates, Respondent
Daniel R. Hansen; KinderCare Education, LLC, f/k/a Knowledge Universe Education, LLC; KinderCare Learning Centers, LLC, d/b/a Park Road KinderCare
Steve MecklerShumaker Loop & Kendrick. LLP, Respondent
Steve MecklerShumaker Loop & Kendrick. LLP, Respondent
Leila Nasser Asr
Leila Nasser Asr — Petitioner
Leila Nasser Asr — Petitioner