No. 22-5279

Abdulhakim Muhammad v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights congressmen-letter due-process federal-jurisdiction foreign-terrorist-organization habeas-corpus national-defense-authorization-act new-evidence standing statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's claims are exempt from the time bar of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)'s one-year statute of limitation, even though the evidence is exempt from the rule against new claims that were not previously presented

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : QucsTion aeesented Whe } er the ee tecrtower’ 3 ; ; ; as ’ oe s Yedcon 1 exempted From Time Bar OF U.S. uy CaS G a ; ws. et iY ¢ SO) One Yen? SIATUE OF Limidarion) even) though wed ere Ses A 9 eB ie _ : ere Ne evidence iS exeme heed From the ole “ean time (ate & New lams thar eee passed BY Copere SS 7 aches The pekheaer 1 A coven re | The ° ; ! Avy Varner Super Max iw Grey AE KAS AS ; £5 pons de T 1S The Director of 7 ack. s aise 4 oe € The Arkaases Degachnent oF Corrections Table o€ Consents Queshron Presented PAches Tirble -of Authorities Deasions Below L ; : Turisedicttoe Consintuhonal Awd Sra tatory Prous ios cuvoived : STATE mepk of The CASE Basis For Federal Sunech cre Lenagns fer Crovtiag the tort A. Confircrs coth Decisions ob oth ar Corts B, Tmpor fan Ce v& The Questor resen +e ; Con ctusied ; f ppan dv A) B,C, d) EF . ; oe anee Court OFF 9.2 lS De Cision oF The meted SHATEE TE ‘ee onder Denying renearwy BY Court o€ AP pens Order Of ne Derek Court 0€ Fhe Usiyed StATes . Congre 5Swens) Lewer Signed by Three Ackansas Congressmen TAbie oF Au thoriHes po CHSC S Engen vy smre Jig Ark 3S 50 3d 2el _ beaquga lin Vo Bocecsox 31 s wad 695 CSteT pars.Seuc\ aniey Us vo unzearg 28) Ws 38 1 SOs.c7 CEG 14 td Tol C1420) crprey mack 2B Nev 359 F1e.707 Crew \8t1), STATUES 13 U.S,C-4 23BBE uU.S.c Arn€ie | guh sectton) 8 clause $1 NDS of Jo'S Seeren S7/ Per | CA $ 2338 ~ Thei _ Shall ha The District Coucts vf rhe united STHTCS f ve exclusive * bed cae Ch, nel Sarisd (chow ever an Aachen Brought undec ats apher ~ Agrer ; ‘ . j a iS The NOGA QOiS SeehuI SU Bhenelmecst , clagsirved par tense” 25 member of # FTO C@ : snaniave 7h Cféregn Femorist Osaniva Tov) An & IN RENTON) TEPC Thus Ing TAis CAS ‘ i 7 ase exclusiwely under the Jurisdichtey oF A fedem! Distt Court STATEMENy OF CASE The. Fethoven Fi ‘ oa ; fe over Fitedl petition For Hasens Gcpus F hating That The SHITE Colin b OF Brew sas did wot have jucssdietioy overthis Case sta Tes§ Firs hy, the erine happeset en Federal lavd Ay a Fedaos) faci hig an & federal eng lopers on dary were the vichas OF This 6Cwme, The Pettonier vide ymcter Girect in Fiuavce /orders of A Fareed TET Org nanrea he cre) N De A WN the Guwthy a& Yemens, The Dishich Caw dened Petites SHIN hws jrame barrel Not thar Ud had womens babealy Sta Ting the Sta Tue of hontarnay dae ditigent CaaS GE 28 ; . yen 2 ts, Cc § 22Y4 Cd) > COS, Fe qameh petchor Fer This SPT of darters The Pe} 5 ee SUBRUTTES “Feo pases of Neo evidence Thy Tues veT AYA LARAS woo cd yhey @ pecect H/ AErEr The one yer de adluye. Thus pngkinrg 1+ New evidence . The evidence WAS 6) A Congres sos jetrer By Three Arkansas Congressmen Te the. Secretacy oF The Aca woe cating Fur the rewsgeding Of The Purple Heact te The Servicemembers Who URE ivoued f; A jac y . i. , Starials He eAgens AS The cettewer was F member 06 9 FTO, inserred awd ECTS Te oy , . rc bya & TO Ard The. congpessmen Ci pel as a rererence the A DAA oF 2015 gectyecl SV | the amended secten That Allowed Menbus who vee wglted or woandeel by & FTO, The Petihorer cid Nod Pecewe this ieTTer a Copy af whch unit fare Qoik eves tinough 1} wag Wwerien ia iaTe POIT, Spann ARTES CONALSS passed the NDAA oF pois wilh the Amended Section SU & The psycho login resulhs ce Petchener By scence poyecholog'st Stat IAG aa was under Mest diseage. Pw? in Fret clarity Ane aerer greet . Maarerere pehne n > ~ . = sarhads guildy plea wis unin iellyontly ancl ask owing 9 sized there fe inva The Dish Court dennel pete , Te Peicluner Appeated tothe 6 Grewdt ged “They Fo DEMISS Pelchor’ aad dewed 4 patrher For Fe-henny: Basis Ter Cedera|Dursclccteon This Case haa posed 1 thie cas P peeve! ond Lederm| tard Cadet Sy THe SHITE CEACIWISAS cedar employees, orgnwrtart eNOS on cluty wer Kalle Aard for wowed by 4 mon ber CF A Foreiges Terrem DANE on which ‘ (Ch mas this case. uncle exclusive yarsdic tiny OF jhe Federas urls per U.S.C 2338 Reasons For Gran TING 19e weit A. CowPlieTS win D . e2cgsievs OF

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-09-02
Waiver of right of respondent Dexter Payne to respond filed.
2022-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Abdulhakim Muhammad
Abdulhakim Muhammad — Petitioner
Abdulhakim Muhammad — Petitioner
Dexter Payne
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent