No. 22-5289

Phillip A. Brown, II v. Cindi Curtin, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction calderon-v-thompson circuit-split collins-v-miller federal-rule-of-civil-procedure-54(b) final-judgment habeas-claims habeas-corpus jury-bias remmer-hearing subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

Petitioner Phillip A. Brown II respectfully petitions this Court for a Writ of Certiorari to review the judgement of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Brown v. Curtin, 2022 U.S. App. Lexis 7535 (6th Cir. March 22, 2022) (#14-1876; R. 103-2).

1. Whether The Circuit Court Must Recall The Mandate In Extraordinary Cases Where It Lacked Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over A Final Judgment Resulting From The District Court's Failure To Adjudicate At Least (4) Habeas Claims Contrary To Collins v. Miller, 252 U.S. 364 (1920)?

2. Whether the Unadjudicated Impartial Jury Claim Must Receive A Full Remmer Hearing And Complete Record To Be Ripe For Judicial Review And Whether The Presumption Of Prejudice And Meaningful Opportunity To Show Prejudice Must Be Enforced By The Courts Where The Colorable Claim Standard Has Been Met?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Circuit Court must recall the mandate in extraordinary cases where it lacked subject-matter-jurisdiction

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent Cindi Curtin to respond filed.
2022-05-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Cindi Curtin
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Phillip A. Brown, II
Phillip A. Brown — Petitioner