Does Carleton's public defender have a history of incompetence or misconduct?

QUESTION(S) pRESENTED( Arad ed datum wi34 tol a \) Does Cartebors public defender have 2 histe F VNcompetere, of msconduck of allegatiog of any Suc belnwvioes ? ay Da Cailebons apliv detente Comnuntate Reckivly with Caleta dasing he Senter arekey| bk a me i) MIke shh eoaFineneat Sor Mae, Hares, months uy Yo . trial? a vn te mu ie salen up to when the tpeal was submitted”, 3) Why was Cailelen act allowed the wetlesadf requested viknesses fo refule the slaler ase! Nor was Carleton alowed auless loinc Matic, Sandaid Hrackees manual. hy? Dei ubak ihbeat was Caclelor removed fram his holding, cell on Janay 35" aoal a eXbing ug to Ye trident did Carleton ever resist o« whe Longin a the U.0.s use excessive Pye on Seas as" 209) inthe tnoid eat thak Carleton iy now Sedna, Oey for | iM oS th b) pia Callen earl Utcoldin Fy the so-called Nera iin " Samay » 20a, non-voluatan ly adtdiemeditsled in defense oF hiy life’ 1.) Vlas “rec\less dis nad ® of schon vse staff aF0.0, of Soar 33303)? %) Was " asonitble and necleseey action trkeh on Senund a6" Qoal? 4) Was ‘neq wnt indi Ference used tn the January VO" goa) o/ and other incident Hpi Cat idhon made teferencr to in ibis paki? 16) Were Calletens 4 Gib fhinerdnent cigs violated « 1) Was CaAleton "Dur froves» Clanse™ Tiles 7 . ; 12) Was Cateton pan shad For past Condutt and wot fo ensoe safely of in cetviation TA maf incidents? , , alowed to testify (dened 5) De baller of tity formar Callmate Gary Pvireruho was nobatlowed todesti (ie PR Calc aail the eg Netter Lscle tons mother without Cisbnl vent 8 4 MDL Carte lons melhet ever voite to Corleton on Nev. 17%" ada he could not use her cace DI Catleln wee aggropridhe force in defending himse\® from an anna) tekichiey gfeah PUN on hin on that he Leemed as sic one Ne Ful bel eat ledane! Wo Did We staff ak 0.05. Knowinaly of wrleahonally Lestroy Cavle bn penonal ly idee, Bie Jd ob RLS. nell tke soni hid of tal pee oe pat then Fesponsible G1 Causinn that Condition Yow ther actions of snechemcally susleing Carle bons tor Questions ratsed AYtachweat af $01 6) Can the," ww boll as applied bs Calleon restrict [at arFlou’ 7 ‘) Mitt such a hold cause in the subject a bid and avloeatic 50 called “ithe lint respon, Bs There any idence see b the State thst Carleen drove, weshers car at al\4 Tf 3 tp ‘heat any evidene that éditeke Krewinaly or intentionall. Usrenarbed bis ineshits | voiud opposition in woity he cae? ST 1 . 1) Does $row exist d afeat feo th A an outdoor cat vg m3 Herd ural ac etn vas ener recy we Ry with dis mer, abies aad A te ired megsules agaist it . ray boeke “aFeckell aad Noa becawie dice Rabid annals X a ces ant ungacobly jut ay Ke ancinal_n question did a Hie dime Carleton coached a attack, teeta, why LL dhe slate not provide Ye Wilblefe bologat Caheton request throu) hey (o-counse| aad public ioe ” . , . B) Why wr» (ai, on Aever iWbdrmed Boot his EI ON we misier At re ye. pak papi ld soma necked as asin tae “Le a ots day despite a nya effects by a4 of \ethars to at ality ily i aoe i ha th , illic {’ lan o Seerlf to J.) sng! E-mails Fem on} CRE WOES FE} Sf ss ner been gh 4 Dt amawer Rather toll Hid gern From Lyn Boule (045 / Pt, DepeAmen| i: Yuman Senvces Ly Stoke FM aine salvo worked in OMe C acity for Vis Clyuis fount al) via Daa Stresk (ees at Mair Correctional Gt) that said pager wry desc ded for bar cove sn ora and Cecas, Vlas Yrore a-Conspirecy as Galluln Uleqes to tosh wchohe angst thar Faclthy 4 ~ of. Secemy Cock teao bade » kb sturdy? | oo. IVs We alto coatinement of Catlelen Tein May Gr all al uti Phunust 4 dow, weliviousl alle in rebliation’se-wure those! conditions ot Co Fc den ove “ fon eve they Ff ne OHuise licked mV hore by ca ud unusua WIVUva NO soli Bj : ; : ule m3 orks ve pc ia tat ow ihe AEST rman AT On the day n Which Cfletin wax alleaedly relasnid Fram, bis ly Ae sarod wel tate code ck akg WO4 Trak done maliciously with “nest millon y sy YWastaffT Questions Raiyed Jbshadmuat upro-3K Was av regort dae with piclures b