No. 22-5299

Michael G. Peters v. Andrew S. Hanen

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-05
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 35-usc-101 civil-rights due-process patent standing takings
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's denial of patent applications for inventions involving artificial intelligence violates the Patent Act and the Constitution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : UES VOWS) PRESEN TEGO /, SS SK LGM OM fe ON ley remenae 70 Wht Fat peg SIC ffeoUwYy 4S a Whi pPyy ze SrtANie CNet! “eae OVS? Off STHLOF po fhetUuNZ Large 07 FEKOSV 6 + f" Ante POLE, ( Peel” peor LIE FECEC SOW INO Celie 7x (CBM Fb Cuts ? | 2. (8 te fi 7d b fee Ae So AKLIUC AC Skog ze Gault A! VUE CAAT AY FO COLL OP? fork te Con PpoeWNE COUT SLC Acmenys 2 | 3 WW bka re Aug JOO Fo ENVIA (N76 A Cf ee CM STEEL, Wei ea fh PbOZL DA CP COE LOC WMH COCCMMS PLUS AND CAT OfLqE Chl S ? Zz: 4 US 7 Flite purK Of rat Atlierl Com 7° GNC BUNCE ANNO WIFMASS LST 7p PROUKMS JO WOE SOUS EC AND CORPGCED C/06 Cl aAS? DS DL 7 vax Dory dk peat 4H COYl7S Fe ee UVCNSU 7UzfONe SZUUMS re coutL: 7? J02(Bl Cl S BY DISALVVNS (lee Orci Kellinit, 7o Bfe fl SAN AE ! 6 US 07 Fae 0FY SK Fea ASP RANT Fo YEN Mf Fite {ETD , AE AN CE AN? Clecuri sant! Of CROUHA CALLE Fu ALK Ll FRAN FO GY WHE NuKiiserhyiN 2? fect Fate (UUM ZS 0 rile fOU7Z¥ Of FH “OAL LC LOTS ltr Flt lees PONDLN AZ FO IL 7 ” Utne ACMI PVPACLhOLYS Dye Witty 7CESS CLC BOTAN S, LO CE ZAC CLIC Fes SSVR ZH fOTTHUISIZE QW val! COSI Wife fee SANS Best guogapais Wiis S CALCD LV ANY POTS) BOYS SP Fed joeP SA Fea (uO (ovnt) ro Cb PATE OF Fagl 1CLx. 20 SOI US FHC Bi PIFEMOE® 7S Dis tIy dll Cel AWW PCCD 8 VEC FINM | (BOF JiWf[ HH Feptlill feel PUCPEME fi fe SPCENCE poy PYEEIOF" uw o Of Shkiitl, je x alts FAR CONN VY FOOTKH) S BIC Ky 2008 CHP AMLMHYWS Fo COLlMe 0 Fat CALS AND C(BIUCTIAS a0 0G O07 fee | 2 LU hy thl7y PAO ES . ZL LIST OF D0 TEL AUST Of PCTS CAM AL PUM OMY Fre COSAS RLM, Fil CALL BLO ALC CFE PUN TONY CONE ALL Of LE QWueeeve vy A ALL, Lithia Te FHC GOtkKCAMYZS COMA AT LR POSMEA, SOM SAL QMO OC GLO A AE RMN TAMMIE , CFF CSSA C80CO AIO a Ye Fit ke, (la She OVS wNA, C0 Lb fehl arpa EFC CCS. eG MME NCAT SfZ-CE&-OF NIWNVIG SYM Y CC wey CaIG (re / LOF-O& 259-Ch “V2 SHS G lt OT WE f FOF XY, WAG Ait ls FV “eg Z2o7lk AMlo CON LVS SIE ff ciere. SMA pS FH CE SIM EM FAVA PLEA JM COMMING ~ 7 Sela mba COS SLAM CIU7Z; 2/-7966 FEOREHA SUDbES COMM Uff . 22zoos) " , , 22-2¢f/EO " , 22-29 OGZ “ = , Ze “EU, f5Z/ 7: 7 GY. 7-4u “ Z/ Z C6 u ‘¢ LED a Z2/|-77IS~ COMMOZ atbopi nto fob PANT COVTSAC 2/-2637/. FAO. SVK Ve” Zacme thks 2/-YCESISACLE OS Jose lonweyy 2/2 SAI9SOUAMM paar (tttlA CO Whe 7 2/-FElOCRU€ MVE ONSOR (PHVIELOUN A £2-20099GUL. CoBCHNG WA PNA ISAS: 2/-77V0 FAXES Hetty, CCM CHS 22-26. COAT Sl PATE tls FCN! CFT 22/-776 7. ZAK PU, OOP gov, (0 22LOIS ~ SCOTT AES 92-20 P7?ZVNOPNI eelF Cocseha C7 2-20 YGOfull) 1770 h AUS of lf 8 FSCS 22-YOCVO" h Zl(VEY 7S~ " h Z/~ POSES * a 2/-Z03%6-" | : . 2Z/-SSO7~ 4 7 26-YOSY7 SAME CUNBAT 2420669. Gob GAG MOPTZA [odkl-U/At 2-2Z9I7F _ Lp-eeFfeEUS LLU Ait SIM Ceti LY-YOVEI~ rape fbireNe of OR LEON + 2ZO-2°6/C 1 SHMYOS » ZL-20VYY& @ 26-§ YOO. EY GIC STAT Citayet Cop Ol 2-TI0[Gee STHAC) ney rrerins ania (evoCry 2/-YOESCO GOU SCALE 20 . LOLA G YES COLT F%s AITO 2(-20G08 ~ C17 CW ele 2/-20379“KE. FUE Mb KE ce (MO SAC§ OSE FILET, C747) 20-2024600 Sue CUMSTSYG J POCEM Cf 22-202254 & Z2-Z202 $5 * ’ 22-SOST6 “ 2tYL HE, LiYS OF” 22-26L9S ~§ CUP. C/N Ay 7771 7H fi (Bz UATE 2226207YGHG SVS LW SOMES 22-2 °32CeoLPp CLIVWNA | AF ZOQN -. OLE X4AL Zee (4. PLEA (7 SOUS ALLL AAS 22-20/8GSColl SUP? PAT Afb als Opti 7S Ze SES: LEA A POL BE 4LICO WV -Stb o : WA IL ~ SC WYP LO , Ve 213, 26 Ye~ Se ve LME SPOS Sra trsres SESE LY -L Sty STK ELE AEXKCEP BOF (726.2 @) cE Sanh oo LZolane Lak cH Cipwelices, STS WE. 2d Foe (Zand Zoo) ae a < eof Serincy¢ Cen. bebe 2gen, SB US SFP SYEY3 fel SCL /°Y3 (pap) Leewe Crp, + Por eye, ry 2 Sigg Bl Shr 2S US Ai CAXS 262537 (Sany) Mee. Levy ~ FF SE USCS Sethieg SOG (%) | . , aaa Conl pL ZL , : ee ws’ Witte OF CLV HENV7S OVI SEELONV . . too. 4 SURISIICTVUY . . ; . Z CWI FOAYUVM ONDA sra@ctr%uey SROUSNS [NV ek GA ; ; . 3G SAH IUIVZ G4 vol CASE... 5 Rey KLWIUVS Kl GEENZIVS FEE [WF 5. es LOL OSV. ; Ze “MOEX 7 AUVEN Z1CEL MUV EN X FZ US soem DIZIICA COCA E SLIAOSGSIYL AITUNKLOYX 8 US. PEL CLOW YEO NM ba YN Trt SWUENU COOPP 6,0 ZHE LIVITEO ARIES PE

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Michael G. Peters
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner