No. 22-5300

Michael G. Peters v. Andrew S. Hanen

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-05
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 6th-amendment civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process jury-selection public-trial
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial applies to jury selection proceedings

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : OQYTAONMS) LLLSEANTLEO 4 LS VF L4GH BNO VE COAL FOP EE FO FH LOY bl (SVleS Fe CH Fae CA Kft SGHKS ROU YY AS 0A WEEMS Fo SONG GUI RMA -SSUAOD 4X ONS Fa Golktrypnyzl, 6 (OI ACEC Sentt{tt fIVf(P Cit /uLCAmE fC AA Ae ANNO CLOW SY KieS') ? 2. LS ST LAWALL 70 OC SEM RWS FO LE JL OA ObWINIF YAS ZACK 700M TS 4S SUNT CPUS ? 3 DST LIWEU KOR OS CRUVWVES Feo PRES Wt 600 BAypghtl C/U C CASES AND pUSNYS Fentig W727 007 gh Nese lo¢M el JI Fi aC BNO CSACHP SE NU! OF Fil COT ? TT: —“ Y YS S7% CFEC FE fil SEW AYT YGRA Wath @ Clit ftll fitt(7Z? S. lo FM LC SOOGAS Yrail FHC ees 20 Juftit ttl S$ feog Cath LCN DHL COPLEY) Zo coltlCL? AN GIVE FHV PORTE TTAI OK AAP Fxu« TT Clelryes NO CEC BES & ca LISZ OF fUPTIES YH LIST GF fitt zits cit) he SALLY za Gif-dUF BC Fant jott0nH0 COWS Qty, Pity Lie OM CRY fOl COMO eo FUE FI thrgtnny cathe oft Phy © PCSAA,, SO Vito. IND Cupryeiz feBCKt tbe LNs AWD COOMN GUS, Clt(0 BOUL, AGC SNOVUUGOINVAUEN TD, [EFC PHU CRANE COV SVL?’ 0% Fel SWB Y AL rie CUOPAGHY! FHKE f'CSZE07 fl WY FAN ((Y YLwly HW ANP LM ZOO LEM ObHO (OSES SCPRMING COAT COIS 2/7795S Corte Liyplh De Feary Cecaie/ 2/-2537/Fel Sky St faci ppeo! Lb YOELISefehur Svomehen ty 77bbfel Juche Coeeropt. a 2ZE-2O0OST11 . . 22Zo/Zo-" A Zi200ge“ 7 22-2of/p7S|" 7 Z/774 7* u 2/-26GG/" ee Z2/774 7~ * i 2/-76/E~ Cree! anal Cnvsee/ feastoniele LOSY3$Syprens foul Ly Lt rae22-2009 Jryl. fOA CeAt perry 2/-776Fesers Chor Peep, Corp COS 2/-20VY0~ (risen fla / S745 ennre yore ekens 22-7eYLGO* h 2/7e773* ; Z/YOS GO, zZ/Zor ve “ , U-S SOT « Y, geet (oul Leperkeri Lede Aten crite 2/-7ZCKE/ Tlie, ffoer! (OW @oJ Ze-2009Y. Stypremy Carl Cle cour-yt 2220/77?Zannuel Prjel our yar. LO-YESY7. KAS 9 sLeelag fervby 2/-2637Y. Z25 flrefia Le pry Slimefa heck 222667 Gow Grey Lbbe es Cove-—g 2/-Yole3fohb Ct fafreboers 2/-2¢ VIG « ‘ ze-89o% SLeelin Crimaf Complauns 4y SA /Peilree rg ofontel Cre) Z/-753/Sheela, ef Puc (€) Heme a [Pye L/Ye 50SlegS¢2h2569E8C, Ly oK (e2-07 Z2(-2° F75Felee, EZ: noel Leg So C4 LLELY MCLZ (AT: 22-202 V6Fel She coetn gy 2e-go2lS8 ; 22-202 557 ; z@YoRR/4 | 22yet 70+ ; 22YO3 BY-U 7: , 2l202 YS~ Feye, (%, Sheen; Aeap Lo, Y erie 22-26t/YFrvef Soke Censpieacy 22-2¢/30Zoenn f. fOreyt-, CeryCH en ne/ 22-20 YY, frre Lberes 27-093 )40 fL4 Cr. fel Soby coer-ops 22-2 65CA fl Spel Levetimneghe 22YarLofish Cow fice CFI eS | 22-2236 DeLee! LINK AY (4, Lane Curt SA 20ZOeF/Ve (“7 orth Crimes | ZELGefELFone Melee § cueteGA 22-2¢/ 75fiLemb Ps CHIME , Abiry brvbe1 Yi20-Clhofb72 Leh Soft Ceet--99f Yi2@-CLGO6EY « “ YI Z2Co SOG Syaremp Corl [len per ees Cleef Mathis brent Aim rele. (f-22767 /fasey laf, Ay enpeprdeen). Y20-vcopjby. Ge Gre bbls Coer-g2h Y:22-CeATS Kked rag 770). LA he SBA DUA ZAS BEE: LAO. KIMCO ON7[SCOP F-7O MURR Cotes COUR : . . Sle 2 NA 2/692 CZnk zoon) . SYS Legal Servers (Epp. v. Ve fog 7 S3/ OU S73 syy-99 12 SC 1043 (20) . OE Feolirr| ele of Cee! fratlirp . .. 4G (TiS 09 Llee hes Li fam ah. . fo Zivl briudral | 47 LIMO SE USC Ste. LIS ~fGET . 2. “BA Chevron Corp. “ f0e2t1g Cre 279 A. Sep Zt 362, 727Y US Pst LEXA ZBLST (5.0NX) Vet $ U, 2/9 . 1S es JME <F CLV HLW ZS OVUN(NVS CAL) | 4 SUSI WW | 2 CONIA Tepe a( AND Sfaruraty _ PROICLNS fNVELLMO | 3% Y/ SCBUMIME NZ Wf THe COLE | Ses LMOSONS Ke Gait ays FE WIZ. . 2627 LCOMCEESIS/. : . . + &e WAY of ALT’¢NO°ICES AiptNa/y A VAST wa WA LAS Sole Cem LMS AL A ttENU B SNCS 1% oe Lk Ai VEE Creole oe IN FrIE SYUlMUE COZ GF Fe CNITEO STARES PLATION FO Will 7 CL Cheb 7eeiie/ fabibertr perpet Le l/y ad Lhol 2 conch oe C eLereri ISOC? A FECEV LA S hyping Dae fev, GUD S ELMS Laedlecal, cocréy He epinen 0 LL CS. Sather, (Xtenl Le ol Ql WA Lfyoeerd 19 Lippoen mA 4 4 + he YU MCA oe LA “aS fOLLE Copel coe 2r L ChYHCY ‘7 Zppated ca Lut WA corveplhrer 77S peperLy at7 pTisle /. SUSI OPIS . rich Covd Leade! 77 Cee we SDhitd FF 2°22 Oo seeg /7 Ligpea ht 4. ZK hh on whieh Je OS 40 (ES Crecek Corl Seerlel ry CESP Aes f//ay SZ LeoZe eS Sllq 59 Lopncty xz Je See AL cf Lhy Con rt ppee/ be! wnle 2EUSC SeLiew (254). axe

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Micahel G. Peters
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner