No. 22-5302

Michael G. Peters v. Actual Innocent Clinic

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-05
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process free-speech public-access standing
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial extends to the public's right to access court records and proceedings in a criminal case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QUESAHIOVLS) SUSAN TED 4 YS 77 LOWPU Ge CWVIW FOAM fee Ft) bMM S006 FO LSA zit roatttSaves PRON Ll A bWGaYWN FO StSKME GNES FULL CA SSAA AEX POSNVS Fhtb Cb tt LMMN fLEPYS POLITLL, Sth Al LN) COLLAB CAML ZAALIING AL TEA UTE N. LMM LOOPUEH ABNF CP LSNOEAKND Le: CON WLLS7lBLO LCF ONS, CD bibbbCIN, LUVULIY FHESTD, fOIIS IC AMM NE FELIU OAD LOUMN, ZC. “L. SS VF LAKE Ao Fe LASEHWIOBNW7S JF6 Opt ttie BND folhe iE AN SPHEW VS EE COLUIA LGOthbU NF KMNOMVES L460 OWI7JONS 4200 LN LNNGEONS P)EOQSACZ WHEW DEN JUD Fit COALIUNG Fe COBL WS meth ciudUuS (bit) BY L6NGEINS LY /NWEAN 74S LUNECENCE ? S$ SYS 47 LEEM FO FOLLY BOLLE Zo OBFWN SEWING BND Ct DW OERWS 7 Y [SF C2600 FO PD ANA BEE) 0 Cthitidl CONS MMLNK Fo BhbfO LP LECSACOFTGY 7? LISA Of6 (bb FES the LF Sablses CY fil Ao Ly (Poy7GADQOV COWVIY. FAKES C42 CBI, MG f F-O8F708207-CL, SWINOLAIV ZA CEI WE /2-O8-OF2Z5°)Cl, JL CU F CK 0. 9-22 F/A, SHV Me tothe Clb NWO 2f-S S37 BNO AOC L664 0/0 Cit LL0WVNS BALW YY flr LASP LUNE i feb ht aN fill) LOKAC/SA WC Lt A NON fb? CAN Lf BETY (CBC LLNS Lh YN AN at/ bE 76 SOBRVELF Feet ite SOCAN SOM SVSZ/D FAtI0tKE YBATIA Bole FIN ND (Gitte Lf Crit Vil CS MAL HLS Mati JAN (ENN EOF” FOL SALLIK SR ZAG 26 BMD Dt 76 SiO fue Olea PIS Fe YAS. LACEY) COSES SUMAN COZ CLIAS: 2) 796b, Coke PROKRA SORES WAP Zé20057, te uw u | 22 ZY g g “ a 4 227 20° BL, ue | te Q 22-2ZAS PY, & Ok , Z2/-Z O69, ; Z/77 Y7, tI ‘¢ I. OVS L/-204¥64 PUY 7ELC AU AE 22-YSYG, ne “ 2/YOY 7. 5, u he 4 c/YOS EY, 4 & 7) Ll -Z os Ye, a ; he 20-8 Y0G, « “ Z/S55 o7, G “ % . 4 : 4 </ “77 7S, Cohteer7 COYN 0 za/El COCNIEC 2/-26 37, COLMULPF 420. Si DLING Ba ME LC Of PLS 2/-VES), SFO SAU (att PLOMM CLES 2LL-SYIG, SUKLIU COoluz CLEtl KFA SANS OF 4/ LTE cpeel ayy WNL AUN Ste Pyt ty 2220079, SSF. 2. OWNS Ce Z/-7799 — FLKES CoeVCOYUENT DOSYLZA Cl fon S 22-220 76, COMF LOLS HE DELL ZINES ZOOLNS CHAS LL-F777, FLKOS NUD M fbbD COUL-C/S 22-Z2009K SCOo7% Ait’ s . 2Z2-20/77, YNNOANA ftolte F COL C/ L£oYOSVY7, PLISW SHAM he LAW BAIS 2Z/-20 374 Z.L5, fF Feo bY SHOMOCEL Ctl OC L/-20 664, GMS LOB67F7 CUMUS 2/YOYES, fOhlf¢fots PEELOSO BC USLS ZO~ZO6 SE, « ee a Z/ZOYSSL 4 4 4 ZoEY OG & “ G TL LZ/-7534 STAUINS pay AONUS B10 fl MULTN Z/YOESY, SCANIU 2/-20608, CFV CF COMA SUA COiftlil? CLS LYSZAMLSY COF GZ COPZGOCLM €LL°377, FLOLLAC (KULIASGE IY PYET CMS? CLF! . 22-292 4¢, Coft7 Jtttlll JS CNELZS 22-20225, Xt u : le Zi262 SS, 4q 4 t, L22YORS/, ¢ Wu “ 22-2Z0/ES, 1 \, 2Z2-YOZOY u k t, 22-24 C6, % 4 Ly) 22-20/52, « 4 t 22-2295, Lovtare Cok Camiutyal Cra7ull Z2-200/Y, FAW SUG COUAWMI) Cuttteyrmy 22-206/32, Lb Iti (abr, Chirnae Cth tte) L2YOR, PLISON Plt) fIL/EL SG AES L22-20ES, STILT COCO SWVLP Zbl ES [1 F £2-¥0%02, KLLIIT CAKW/ Filmy flor cpr baoy Celta) 22-202 76; QOACL SNNOULYA COLIC CO Cf €2-2009/ BANttK [CLA CLUS BNO Lbnt/ ae L2-20/80, SKK OMLYF NMETV VME LOLA. CY 22-2274, LNNVAAMUIYE QL chins 2S SOUPMIUN YSZ COU . Wi22-LLG6 72, ColtOPF {662 SONG L 722 ChOOGGE, u ‘ L0-22-7¢7, PUUSYS PILE AUS BAELO OLED Si22-CCY S62, SMISWD) GLUVLN TK SCAV"A Yi2E-LL-Of67Y, L:SCHOL/Y (0A CLOUT COWL Yi22-C-/SI6b6, AOUMWMISD, COMMA Bhat bgt CAN IEC rm Yi22-Cb00765, BOW LOE TI CO fF S'22bS750, SUEY TOW Prt P0 LHS MEY COGS ZUNN SPALL SAP Pte ChlhISP St ft SUES f9t6 LOE WV ify SEP LIF PROKNLO7ZG LAP) Chk fbb 7¥ AW. OFC. COILS Vhiithk, GR BU PUTS CMD PERL JeKkes Lelie! Mcerl Conyp/ond #Y3-/757 «Sf Yiu Shika. . , LY fyetorlee Cleimr. ; ; TY fel fale cf Cerf froteder COB). LE Sxlhv. Zrbere Lyale leider, re ME Zl FO? (Eré 20%). : SS Z. c/ Sertice Cir “Kn Ve lege. SI US TS 3S S¥2-F8 Pl SC OK (207). . Prise? Libhsehoer hiben Ble Pilla Yb Keleleony Zottetnee § C7 yal Onxenaches blo fe USC Sec. FHPSH CO Checroa Corp. +: Denes 97Y 7. Sy 24 262 CSI US. ul. LAKIS EXER GFANK) «FC Per b % 2A. IN) THE SUPELLIVIC COULEF OF Far LYING ZA) SPAFES PLIITIODN Fill AA WHIZ GCF CER ZHALL/ Pebsbiare respech, tty ft ays Ahat 2 wrid of c6orlieror: ISSOE PA FCOUIC AY 4h judy enone be low. GPYVISS LALCW The gainion of Lhe Unided Waly Seslbern la

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Michael G. Peters
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner