When a sentencing judgment entry of commitment is legally invalid, is habeas corpus still the remedy to correct the judgment entry of commitment when considering the AEDPA?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) When a sentencing judgment entry of commitment is legally invalid, according to state and clearly established federal law as determined by this court in Hill v. Wampler (1936), 298 U.S. 460, 56 S.Ct. 76, 1936 U.S. LEXIS 716, is a habeas corpus still the remedy to correct the judgment entry of commitment when considering the enactment of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) of April 24,1996? (2) Does an administrative agency, such as Ohio’s Parole Board, have jurisdiction to deprive a United States Citizen (state prisoner) of liberty based on a void invalid journal entry of commitment? _ : | |