No. 22-5313

Jesse Rondale Bailey v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-3553(a)(6) career-offender criminal-procedure empirical-evidence evidence-based judicial-discretion presumption sentencing-disparities sentencing-guidelines unwarranted-disparity within-range-sentences
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a court may categorically refuse to consider empirical evidence showing that other judges impose sentences below the guideline range in the vast majority of cases in which the guideline applies, or showing that the guideline itself embodies structural disparities

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED When evaluating whether a sentence imposed within the applicable guideline range avoids unwarranted sentencing disparities under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6), may a court categorically refuse to consider empirical evidence showing that other judges impose sentences below the guideline range in the vast majority of cases in which the guideline applies, or showing that the guideline itself embodies structural disparities? ii

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 8, 2022)
2022-05-31
Application (21A769) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until August 5, 2022.
2022-05-24
Application (21A769) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 6, 2022 to August 5, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Jesse Rondale Bailey
Jennifer Niles CoffinFederal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Petitioner
Jennifer Niles CoffinFederal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent