Did the 4th Circuit err in denying the petitioner's grounds for relief when the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : D) Did th 4 Circuit ere in denying 2F WC F 224i moon grounds for relief hen knowingly “tke petitioner constitutional rights were violated by He Agents of th Federal Bureau: of Tawestgahon . 2) How can te petitioner be a two places af once, when provers fo. Wal edready (acarcerated wn auother county in the commission of the rine. Where He pehtene asserted thet he was not im the county or State , and fe was in tl at te -imes of the allesecd crime acing he was out of Hate due te drivins trucks. 3) Te 4A correct thet thy thigh Court Supreme Court honsred Paley, Calrfornia , (BY SCH af Wand Carpenter « US, 138 §. CH 220¢, which GE violation of hus the petihonev'y UE Aryandmint Right which w law regrdless of the. tine, and 1s legal where the pehtimer qualifies. 4) How can +e petitioners Nucando. rights be 'grored through being Farged where the ped tone sent in he dei ing lieense and Signature proving he did not sign an miranda affidevit and bus rights Were violated 1S also necits without a chubt and had req ussted an expert in this vegewd ih this pehtion and Jor any other. huranda + Arizona , oF4 US 436 ,\e LEdzd bY , Fle SCH 1eo2 (14ee). a 5) As +o all records the pehtioner asks , E all yccords Show end wnekicate proving t recelVng, : all documents From the (Fora) Free dow of Tnformetion Act Stating the facts “Het tle AWA Olisia SP Choe did not have an dath of Office te prosecute let alone an Aopotintnent ACG dat or Proof ofErployment through tte US Department of cJushee phere no records ave found in the (Fon)(Eoush)( 01? )(0G15)(nrec c) ner the (naea) we the Florida Bor and the Florida Board of Bar Eeaniners Showsing Saud . on tHe court leaving grounds fr dismissal .