Whether the court erred in declaring the federal law 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(4) and the Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.430(b) invalid

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Aag iT Fundamedlal Over b Guyiela Defendant under an flleved of incomplete Cesser included charge whee Gunse| Wicwslvaly agrees Tethe insliud ton be tw reeorel Of cmc ‘ howd “HN” Gunsel Wedd aduare of Nte. HTivalion ‘ Wssten amd AFirwalivebly agreed TT awd (Tis also Ccottary For te veeord @ domeiltle thel— AMA ThET Hoe tnatructc Gungsel was ANOWY | aS allened , WO eyrenesus 7 5 MBvrmed Uso. Hares publi c Tau pertemee GiiGeel en randy y. Sate Z.7 yVSele , 2S S3d 346 ( 24 STC 2014). Knight 267-23d 4950. | Q-— We the Clee rendored by ‘te. Gurl (Ss) declaring tavaled He Fredare} Law 28 0809 8 '915@) (4) and The Flerido Rub of FropetleTe. preecedure q430(A)CB) ? 3° Ts 1 Hundameniial Evror To Guuicl @ DefendontiT under 4 “Perpured WorranT Ares” AebdawiT conlrary Te We Fleyi dd Steqyole. Chapter 133 , Florida Sale. $837.02; Te He Eleqrute Gwuwialen Pri vec Act and He Hrendment” AV, Vand SUG oF +te dulled Sila, Garitition 7