No. 22-5352

Travis Thomas, Jr. v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment criminal-procedure factual-description factual-distinction fifth-amendment grand-jury grand-jury-clause indictment-modification prescription-drug required-element trial-amendment
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Fifth Amendment's Grand Jury Clause prohibit a trial amendment altering a factually distinct description of a required element?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : No. _— In the Supreme Court of the Gnited States TRAVIS THOMAS, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED JN FORMA PAUPERIS TO THE HONORABLE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES: NOW COMES Petitioner TRAVIS THOMAS, JR., and, pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 39 and 18 U.S.C. §3006A(d)(7), prays for leave to file the accompanying Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit without prepayment of costs and to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner was represented both at trial and on direct appeal by counsel appointed by the District Court under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §3006A(c). A copy of the docket sheet reflecting the orders appointing trial and appellate counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act is set forth in the

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Travis Thomas
John Anthony PeraltaLaw Office of John A. Peralta, Petitioner
John Anthony PeraltaLaw Office of John A. Peralta, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent