No. 22-5355
Carlocito Slim, aka Carlocito Ponce Slim v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: age-of-consent criminal-intent criminal-law due-process entrapment law-enforcement-conduct mens-rea sex-trafficking statutory-interpretation victim-age
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant can be convicted under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 (b) or 1591 (a)(1) on the basis of inconsistent ages of a single non-existent victim given by law enforcement
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether a defendant can be convicted under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 (b) or 1591 (a)(1) on the basis of inconsistent ages of a single non-existent victim given by law enforcement, one age being under the age of 18 years and the other age being over the age of 18 years, because it is impossible to ascertain the intent of a defendant. i
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-08-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Carlocito Slim
Terry L Pechota — Pechota Law Office, Petitioner
Terry L Pechota — Pechota Law Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent