No. 22-536
Eliezer Alberto Jimenez v. United States
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure guilty-plea habeas-corpus miscarriage-of-justice unconstitutional-conditions waiver-of-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether requiring a criminal defendant to waive the right to seek habeas corpus or its substitute as a condition of a guilty plea violates the unconstitutional conditions doctrine
Question Presented (from Petition)
question presented by Harper v. United States, No. 22-5111. i)
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-27
Reply of petitioner Eliezer Alberto Jimenez filed. (Distributed)
2023-03-13
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-02-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 13, 2023.
2023-02-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 10, 2023 to March 13, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 10, 2023.
2023-01-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 11, 2023 to February 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-12-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 11, 2023)
Attorneys
Eliezer Alberto Jimenez
Andrew Timothy Tutt — Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, Petitioner
Andrew Timothy Tutt — Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent