No. 22-5360
Wayne Chin v. Joseph Noeth, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: accused-autonomy actual-innocence attorney-client-relationship autonomy constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-counsel due-process right-to-counsel sixth-amendment unwelcome-defense
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defense counsel can override an accused's final and informed decision for an actual innocence defense and impose an unwelcome defense upon the accused against his objections, resulted in a violation of the Sixth Amendment secured autonomy?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER A DEFENSE COUNSEL CAN OVERRIDE AN ACCUSED’S FINAL AND INFORMED DECISION FOR AN ACTUAL INNOCENCE DEFENSE AND IMPOSE AN : UNWELCOME DEFENSE UPON THE ACCUSED AGAINST HIS OBJECTIONS, RESULTED IN A VIOLATION OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT SECURED AUTONOMY?
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-12
Waiver of right of respondent Joseph Noeth to respond filed.
2022-08-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 15, 2022)
Attorneys
Joseph Noeth
Leonard Joblove — Kings County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Leonard Joblove — Kings County District Attorney's Office, Respondent