No. 22-5367
Derrick Lee Hinton v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-interpretation federal-jurisdiction federal-power first-amendment free-speech government-criticism judicial-review legal-precedent native-american-rights sovereignty-doctrine tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal government's reliance on the tribal sovereignty doctrine violates the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause by restricting criticism of the federal government's treatment of Native American tribes
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS) PRESENTED —S~™S Sa _PREWISeS Add LoGic of Me TEBal WAL SoVEREGATY _DoTTRANE, Well Wes Reed The SoBeCI” of RelesTZesS _ CRITISISM. By_YEMRERG oF THe Bedell, Rag AND ___ ReADENY FoR eve GO YenRs TS DATE; ible! HAS _ Reed ese BY The LATE “57 Ginstur as Ad ; MF FeOST TS Huuad Diqhit|" MD Well jas Reed __eseriv By Ss Gokwell To Re" Akos wed cI as wivestey nity or Reunins ealg Tabal” 2
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent