No. 22-5371
Darrell Harris v. Robert Hudgins, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: collateral-estoppel federal-court federal-offense federal-prosecution issue-preclusion res-judicata sixth-amendment speedy-trial
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether principles of res judicata triggered application of issue preclusion and collateral estoppel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; WHETHER PRINCIPLES OF "RES JUDICATA" TRIGGERED APPLICATION OF ISSUE PRECLUSION AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL SO AS TO DEPRIVE THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUTHORITY TO CHARGE THE PETITIONER WITH A FEDERAL OFFENSE BASED ON THE SAME FACTS USED IN A PRIOR STATE PROCEEDINGS BUT WHICH WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT'S "SPEEDY TRIAL" CLAUSE?
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent Hudgins, Robert to respond filed.
2022-07-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2022)
Attorneys
Hudgins, Robert
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent