No. 22-5372
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: Federal and U.S. Supreme Court precedent demands Kansas Supreme Court precedent civil-procedure constitutional-challenge due-process federal-precedent judicial-review kansas-supreme-court procedural-due-process state-court state-court-review state-precedent state-statute statutory-review supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a state high court can deny review of a constitutional challenge to its own statute when procedural due process, state precedent, and federal precedent demand its hearing
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Wheather a state high court can deny a review to a constitutional challenge of its own statute when procedural due process, Kansas Supreme Court precedent, Federal and | U.S. Supreme Court precedent demands its hearing. : 1
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent Kansas to respond filed.
2021-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2022)
Attorneys
Kansas
Brant M. Laue — Solicitor General of Kansas, Respondent
Brant M. Laue — Solicitor General of Kansas, Respondent