No. 22-5377
Malik Breyon Hollis v. Matthew Magnusson, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection jury-composition jury-selection peremptory-challenges racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether peremptory challenges of racial minorities during jury selection in criminal trials should be subjected to a heightened judicial inquiry of strict scrutiny
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether peremptory challenges of racial minorities during jury selection in criminal trials should be subjected to a heightened judicial inquiry of strict scrutiny. 2. Whether peremptory challenges in the jury selection process should be eliminated altogether. i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-17
Waiver of right of respondent Maine to respond filed.
2022-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2022)
Attorneys
Maine
Donald William Macomber — Maine Office of Atty. Gen., Respondent
Donald William Macomber — Maine Office of Atty. Gen., Respondent
Malik Hollis
James Paul Howaniec — Howaniec Law Offices, Petitioner
James Paul Howaniec — Howaniec Law Offices, Petitioner