Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in finding petitioners' claim to be frivolous

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WHETHER, The Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Erred In Finding Petitioners’ Claim To Be Frivolous after, as stated by the Appellate Court “Upon a review of the record, the response to the court’s January 11,2022 order, and the opening brief field on February 10, 2022.” Petitioners request that the Court review the U.S. Court of Appeals documents previously submitted by Petitioners (response, Respondents’ documents of Petitioners’ Previously Filed In The U.S Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeal; Docket/Petitioner; which Respondent erred finding Petitioner’s Appeal to be frivolous? 2. WHETHER, The Ninth Circuit Appeals Court Abused Its Discretion by Upholding The Eastern District Court’s Decision And Order Dated: June 14, 2022, Dismissing Plaintiffs’ Case As Being Frivolous? : 3. WHETHER, The Ninth Circuit Court Erred In Finding Appellant’s in forma pauperis status, And The Appeal “not taken in good faith and revoked Appellant’s in forma pauperis status? 4. WHETHER, The Ninth Circuit Appeals Court Abused Its Discretion by Denying Plaintiff/ To Proceed In Forma Pauperis? . 5. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Abused its discretion, erred, and Deprived Petitioners Of A Fair and Just Trial/RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS by determining that Petitioners’ Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is Frivolous concluding, denying, and dismissing Petitioners’ Appeal as Frivolous? 6. WHETHER, The Ninth Circuit Appeals Court Abused Its Discretion by i Informing The Eastern District Court To Consider Certifying Court to Certify Appellant’s Appeal “is not taken in good faith” And The Ninth Circuit Court “determined Appellant’s Case To Be Frivolous And The Ninth Circuit Appellate Court Dismissed Plaintiff Case? 7. WHETHER, the Eastern District Magistrate Judge Abused her discretion by failing to grant Request For an Ex Parte? 8. WHETHER, The Eastern District Magistrate Judge Abused her discretion by not allowing to have the option to Decline or Accept Magistrate Judge who involved herself case? 9. WHETHER, Plaintiff M.T. was at risk of catching the Delta Variant or Corona Virus by attending crowded school of children at FOREVER FRIENDS EARLY LEARNING CENTER LLC Where The School’s Adult Worker, Teacher, And Care Giver Left Minor Children Unattended To Roam Into The Front Office Without Masks, Where And Her Companion Adult Experienced The Two Children, Unattended and Walking Up To Both Adults Without Both Of The Children Wearing Masks? 10. WHETHER, The Sacramento Superior Court Family Law Judge acted outside of her Judicial Authority or Scope of her duty by making an order that deprive Carina Conerly of her United States Constitution Guaranteed Right to video tape in a public place? : 11. WHETHER, The Sacramento County Family Law Judge is protected by the ii Immunity Clause against suit when she made and adopted an Order that was to deprive Carina Conerly and of her Constitution Right to video tape in public, which is a right guaranteed under the First Amendment? 12. WHETHER, the California Eastern District Court Magistrate Judge abused her discretion by not granting Carina Conerly's Request for an Ex Parte hearing on her daughter attending early learning pre-school to be putting her health and life at risk due to the Corona and Delta Viruses? 13. WHETHER, California Superior Court Family Law Judges acted together and violated Carina Conerly’s United States Constitution Rights guaranteed under the First, Fifth, Fourteenth Amendment of The United States Constitution in a Conspiracy to protect their unconstitutional conduct? 14. WHETHER, the Sacramento County Superior Court of California Judge Yap abused her discretion by continuing the order that were to Speak to Sharif Tarpin on the subjects that the Magistrate Judged choose for Carina Conerly to speak on, or Plaintiff/Appellant /Petitioner could be prosecuted Civilly, and Criminally (Criminal is not filed for redress in This Case at hand)? ili